Creationism and carbon 14 dating
This suggested the creation was conceivably older than the 6,000-year timeframe proposed by Ussher and Lightfoot. In fact, some genealogies include names that are left out by other genealogies in Scripture itself.” As evidence the genealogies are telescoped (compressed or abbreviated), scholars point to examples such as the genealogy of Moses, which appears four separate times in Scripture (Exodus -20, Numbers -59, 1 Chronicles 6:1-3, 23:6-13).
Today many Bible scholars believe the Genesis genealogies were written primarily to provide only highlights and not necessarily a complete record of every actual generation. Moses’ genealogy is given as Levi to Kohath to Amran to Moses.
Neither is there a rule of Hebrew language demanding that all numbered days in a series refer to twenty-four hour days.
Even if there were no exceptions in the Old Testament, it would not mean that ‘day’ in Genesis 1 could not refer to more than one twenty-four-hour period.” Archer and Geisler also point out that no definite article (“the”) appears with yôm on days one through five in Genesis one.
Gordon Wenham concurs: “Six days has been seized on and interpreted over-literally, with the result that science and Scripture have been pitted against each other instead of being seen as complementary.” century examination of the Genesis genealogies by Archbishop James Ussher and theologian John Lightfoot.
Experts in Old Testament genealogy note there is wide-spread consensus regarding dates and chronology from the time of Abraham.Hebrew linguist Gleason Archer writes, “On the basis of internal evidence, it is this writer’s conviction that yôm in Genesis could not have been intended by the Hebrew author to mean a literal twenty-four hour day.” Dr.Norman Geisler states, “Numbered days need not be solar.This paper presents the biblical case for “old-earth creationism” (OEC) and endeavors to clear up theological misconceptions regarding OEC held by many well-intentioned “young-earth creationist” (YEC) believers.The purpose is not to dissuade young-earth believers from their position, but rather to propose OEC as a well-reasoned, Bible-honoring view that has been embraced by scholars such as Francis Schaeffer, James Boice, and Norman Geisler.